CIVILICA We Respect the Science
(ناشر تخصصی کنفرانسهای کشور / شماره مجوز انتشارات از وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی: ۸۹۷۱)

Evaluation of responsiveness to non-clinical demands of patients in Iran: a quantitative study on the university hospitals in Bushehr

عنوان مقاله: Evaluation of responsiveness to non-clinical demands of patients in Iran: a quantitative study on the university hospitals in Bushehr
شناسه ملی مقاله: JR_JSDI-3-2_005
منتشر شده در در سال 1396
مشخصات نویسندگان مقاله:

Mahboobeh-Sadat Modarresi - Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
Habib Omranikhoo - Faculty of Public Health, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
Mozhgan Modarresi - Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Niloofar Motamed - Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran

خلاصه مقاله:
Background: Responsiveness along with health promotion and financial risk protection plays a pivotal role in health systems. The present study aimed to examine responsiveness in hospitals affiliated to Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, in the south-west of Iran.Methods: In a cross-sectional study, the statistical population consisted of the patients referring to two university hospitals in Bushehr, namely Persian Gulf Hospital and Bushehr Heart Center. In total, ۴۰۲ patients were selected using the stratified random sampling method. Data was collected using a demographic questionnaire and the validated Persian version of the standard World Health Organization questionnaire on health system responsiveness to assess responsiveness level during ۲۰۱۵.Results: Responsiveness level was statistically different between the two hospitals (۲.۳±۰.۵۸ and ۲.۷±۰.۵۰, respectively). In general, “access to social support” (۳±۰.۹۳) and “choice of health provider” (۱.۷±۰.۹۳) obtained the highest and lowest scores. Apart from “confidentiality” and “access to social support,” a statistically significant difference was observed in other domains (dignity”, “autonomy”, “communication”, “quality of basic amenities”, “choice of health care provider”, and “prompt attention” ( between the two hospitals. Conclusion: University hospitals studied had an average performance regarding responsiveness. It seems necessary to pay more attention to two domains of responsiveness including choice of health provider and autonomy in the hospitals.

کلمات کلیدی:
Hospital; Iran; Responsiveness; Patient Satisfaction; Patient Rights

صفحه اختصاصی مقاله و دریافت فایل کامل: https://civilica.com/doc/1546591/