CIVILICA We Respect the Science
(ناشر تخصصی کنفرانسهای کشور / شماره مجوز انتشارات از وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی: ۸۹۷۱)

A comparison of EPM and WEPP models for estimating soil erosion of Marmeh Watershed in the south Iran

عنوان مقاله: A comparison of EPM and WEPP models for estimating soil erosion of Marmeh Watershed in the south Iran
شناسه ملی مقاله: ICARA01_164
منتشر شده در همایش بین المللی پژوهش های کاربردی در کشاورزی در سال 1394
مشخصات نویسندگان مقاله:

Hassan Amini - Department of Agricultural Engineering , Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Naser Honarjoo - Department of Agricultural Engineering , Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Ahmad Jalaliyan - Department of Agricultural Engineering , Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Mojtaba Khalilizadeh - Department of Civil Engineering , Larestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Larestan, Iran.

خلاصه مقاله:
Soil erosion and sediment yield is one of the main challenges in Iran, and quantity estimation of them is an important issue. Two models (the empirical Erosion Potential Method (EPM) and the physical Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP)) were applied to predict soil loss and sediment yield for the Marmeh Watershed. After watershed modeling, the simulated sediment yield values were compared with the observed sediment yield values.In the calibration and validation periods, the Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency (ENS) values forthe WEPP and EPM were 0.977 and 0.981, and 0.903 and 0.927 for WEPP and EPM,respectively. Also, deviation (Re) between the mean simulated and observed sediment values for the WEPP and EPM models were -8.5% and -2.4%, and -2.0% and -0.5%, respectively. These results indicate that the WEPP simulations were better than EPM, and could be used for soil loss and sediment yield estimation in the Marmeh Watershed.

کلمات کلیدی:
Soil loss; Sediment yield; Calibration, Validation

صفحه اختصاصی مقاله و دریافت فایل کامل: https://civilica.com/doc/414941/