CIVILICA We Respect the Science
(ناشر تخصصی کنفرانسهای کشور / شماره مجوز انتشارات از وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی: ۸۹۷۱)

A Diagnostic Accuracy Comparison Between Tzanck Smear Test and Frozen Section Examination in Basal Cell Carcinoma

عنوان مقاله: A Diagnostic Accuracy Comparison Between Tzanck Smear Test and Frozen Section Examination in Basal Cell Carcinoma
شناسه ملی مقاله: ACPLMED20_097
منتشر شده در بیستمین همایش سالانه و سومین همایش بین المللی آسیب شناسی و طب آزمایشگاه در سال 1397
مشخصات نویسندگان مقاله:

Mazaher Ramezani - Molecular Pathology Research Center, Emam Reza University Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
Elias Salimi - Skin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Sima Nazemi - Molecular Pathology Research Center, Emam Reza University Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
Sedigheh Khazaei - Molecular Pathology Research Center, Emam Reza University Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

خلاصه مقاله:
Background: Mohs’ micrographic surgery is a suitable treatment and frozen section (FS) examination is the gold standard of surgical margins in tumoral skins. This study compared the diagnostic accuracy between the Tzanck smear test (TST) and frozen section (FS) examination for margin control in surgery for basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Methods: Fifty-nine patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) were included. The tumor was excised and the Tzanck smear test (TST) was taken for Papanicolaou staining (Pap staining) and reconfirmation of tumoral cells. Then a dermatologist took margins of tumoral mass. TST was taken from the margins and sent to the dermatopathologist for Pap staining. After dying, each marked fragment was sectioned separately with cryostat. Finally, diagnostic accuracy of TST compared with FS examination was analyzed. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of TST for the evaluation of margin were 0.28 and 0.95; whereas positive and negative predictive values were 0.54 and 0.85, respectively. Positive and negative likelihood values were 5.36 and 0.76, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 0.82. The kappa coefficient of agreement between the two methods was 0.28 (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Positive likelihood value and specificity of TST for the evaluation of margin were high; therefore, TST can be suitable in the diagnosis of BCC, but due to low sensitivity and kappa coefficient, TST alone cannot be a suitable alternative method compared to the FS examination for margin control in BCC.

کلمات کلیدی:
Frozen Sections, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Cytology

صفحه اختصاصی مقاله و دریافت فایل کامل: https://civilica.com/doc/899209/