An Investigation into the Effective Factors in Comprehending English Garden-Path Sentences by EFL Learners

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 232

فایل این مقاله در 40 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-38-1_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 8 بهمن 1399

چکیده مقاله:

The present study aimed at highlighting the possible effects of age, proficiency level, and the structural composition of Garden-Path (GP) sentences on EFL learners' comprehension. 80 Iranian EFL learners were recruited from the initial pool of 114 participants based on the results of an English proficiency test; 40 advanced, and 40 intermediate learners were selected. Moreover, two age-groups of teenagers and adults were specified based on the study's necessities. In order to determine the accuracy and also the time needed for comprehension of GP sentences, a software application was designed, which provided learners with a set of GP and non-GP sentences and depicted the elapsed time for each participant to show the correct understanding of the presented sentences on the screen. As statistical analyses revealed, the participants, apart from age and proficiency levels, had less difficulty in comprehending non-GP items. It was also concluded that different types of GP sentences imposed different degrees of difficulty for the participants to comprehend. Furthermore, "proficiency level," unlike "age," was found to be a determining factor for the comprehension of GP sentences for Iranian EFL learners.

کلیدواژه ها:

Age ، comprehension ، EFL learners ، Garden-path sentences and their structures ، proficiency level

نویسندگان

Ghaffar Barahuyee

department of foreign languages and linguistics, Shiraz University, Iran

Mohammad Saber Khaghaninejad

Department of foreign languages and linguistics, Shiraz University, Iran

Amirsaeid Moloodi

Department of foreign languages and linguistics, Shiraz University, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Abbasian, G. R. & Moeenian, S. (2015). Validation and Investigation ...
  • Akmajian, A., Demeres, R., Farmer, A., & Harnish, R. (2001). Linguistics: ...
  • Aldama, F. L. (2010). Toward a cognitive theory of narrative ...
  • Beare, A. M. (2017). Cognitive aging. Gerontology perspectives, 3, 89-109. ...
  • Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. Cognition ...
  • Carreiras, M., Clifton, C. & Meseguer, E. (2002). Overt reanalysis ...
  • Choi, Y. & Trueswell, J. C. (2010). Referential and syntactic ...
  • Christianson, K., Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Ferreira, ...
  • Crain, S., & Coker, P. (1979). A Semantic Constraint on ...
  • Engelhardt, P. E. (2014). Children’s and adolescents’ processing of temporary ...
  • Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. ...
  • Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: ...
  • Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1987). Resolution of syntactic category ...
  • Gerth, S., & Graben, P. (2009). Unifying syntactic theory and ...
  • Harley, B. (2008). Age in second language acquisition. College-Hill publications. ...
  • Hickok, G. (1993). Parallel parsing: Evidence from reactivation in garden-path ...
  • Jovanovic J. C. (2013). Taking your own path: Individual differences ...
  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory ...
  • Khosravizadeh, P., & Pashmforoosh, R. (2012). How are parts of ...
  • Khosravizadeh, P., Latifi, A., & Ghaziani, G., Ahmadi, A. (2015). ...
  • Marcus, M. P. (1980). Theory of syntactic recognition for natural ...
  • Marzban, A. & Sepassi, F. (2005). On the effects of ...
  • Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A., Fodor, ...
  • Parpanchi, Z. S. (2014). The Comprehension of Garden-Path Structures by ...
  • Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. C. (2016). Second language processing ...
  • Rayner, K., Kambe, G., & Duffy, S. A. (2000). The ...
  • Reisberg, J. (2010). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in ...
  • Roberts, L. (2012). Individual differences in second language sentence processing. ...
  • Shooshtari, Z. G. & Shahri, S. (2014). Down the garden ...
  • Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in ...
  • Tabor, W., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1999). Dynamical models of ...
  • Townsend, D. J., & Bever, T. G. (2001). Sentence comprehension: The ...
  • Traxler, M. J. (2014). Trends in syntactic parsing: Anticipation, Bayesian ...
  • Traxler, M. J., & Tooley, K. M. (2007). Lexical mediation ...
  • Van Gompel, R. P., Pickering, M. J. (2006). The activation ...
  • Van Gompel, R. P., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & ...
  • Yoo, H., & Dickey, M. W. (2011). Aging Effects and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع