Comparing the Impacts of E-learning and Conventional Education on Students’ Academic Motivation and Performance: A Descriptive Study

سال انتشار: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 220

فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_MEDIA-11-3_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 فروردین 1400

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Today, e-learning has become an integral part of educational practice around the world and plays a relatively significant role in student learning. E-learning is an educational approach in which educators and learners make use of electronic tools and technologies to communicate with each other in spite of distance and lack of close communication. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of e-learning and conventional methods on the academic motivation and performance of fifthgrade elementary school students in Shiraz, Iran. Methods: A descriptive study was conducted in 2019-2020 academic year. A convenience sampling method was applied and the research sample consisted of 268 students (134 in e-learning group; 134 in conventional education group). Data collection tools included the EPT questionnaire (Based on Pham and Taylor) and the academic motivation questionnaire (Vallerand et al.). Independent t-test was used for data analysis. Results: the results showed that the mean of the academic motivation among the e-learning students is higher than the conventional learning students (p <0.001). Furthermore, in terms of academic performance, the mean score of the motivation component in the e-learning group was higher than the conventional education group (P=0.03). There was no significant difference between the two groups in other components of the academic performance. Conclusion: The results showed that e-learning had a greater impact on student motivation. More research with larger samples is required to better understand the possible advantages of this method.

نویسندگان

Amir Touraj Ghorbani

Department of e-Learning in Medical Sciences, Virtual School (Comprehensive Center of Excellence for e-Learning in Medical Sciences) Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Nahid Zarifsanaiey

Virtual School, Comprehensive Center of Excellence for Electronic Learning in Medical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Mohammad Bagher Negahban

Assistant Professor of Information Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Zarif Sanaiey N, Karamizadeh Z, Faghihi AA, Mohammadi H. The ...
  • Gopalan V, Juliana A, Abdul Nasir Z, Asmidah A, and ...
  • Tohidi H, Jabbari MM. The effects of motivation in education. ...
  • Wigfield, A., and Eccles, J. S. Expectancy–value theory of achievement ...
  • Hartley, K., and Bendixen, L. D. Educational research in the ...
  • Hu S, Kuh GD. Being (dis) engaged in educationally purposeful ...
  • Akomolafe MJ, Ogunmakin AO, Fasooto GM. The role of academic ...
  • Simpson WK, Pychyl TA. In search of the arousal procrastinator: ...
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions ...
  • Lavasani MG, Weisani M, Shariati F. The role of achievement ...
  • Bengtsson M, Ohlsson B. The nursing and medical students motivation ...
  • Mousavi, S.A.,  Razavi, S.A. &  Rahimidoost, G. Comparison of the ...
  • Barrow L, Markman L, Rouse CE. Technology's edge: The educational ...
  • Sezer B. Faculty of medicine students' attitudes towards electronic learning ...
  • Sung YH, Kwon IG, Ryu E. Blended learning on medication ...
  • Sinclair PM, Kable A, Levett-Jones T, Booth D. The effectiveness ...
  • Francis MK, Wormington SV, Hulleman C. The costs of online ...
  • Hung ML, Chou C, Chen CH, Own ZY. Learner readiness ...
  • Yoo SJ, Huang WD. Engaging online adult learners in higher ...
  • Harris DM, Parrish DE. The art of online teaching: Online ...
  • Xu D, Jaggars SS. The impact of online learning on ...
  • Button D, Harrington A, Belan I. E-learning & information communication ...
  • Noor Mohammadian, M. Investigating the relationship between academic performance and ...
  • Qaqtash, A.; Oji Nejad, A. and Barzegar, M., The effect ...
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic motivation and ...
  • Vallerand RJ., Pelletier LG., Blais MR., Briere N M., Senecal ...
  • Bahrani, M., Study of academic motivation of high school students ...
  • Ritzhaupt, A., Martin, F., & Daniels, K. Multimedia competencies for ...
  • Furió D, Juan MC, Seguí I, Vivó R. Mobile learning ...
  • Cabero-Almenara J, Marín-Díaz V, Sampedro-Requena BE. Meta-analysis of research in ...
  • Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Baki M. The effectiveness ...
  • McCutcheon K, Lohan M, Traynor M, Martin D. A systematic ...
  • Kadivar‚ P.  Psychology of learning. Tehran: SAMT,2009. ...
  • Broadbent J, Poon WL. Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement ...
  • Arbaugh JB. Is there an optimal design for on-line MBA ...
  • Kosovich JJ, Flake JK, Hulleman CS. Short-term motivation trajectories: A ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع