A Randomised Clinical Trial Evaluating the Clinical Performance of Compomer and Composite Materials in Class II Primary Molar Restorations: ۲۴-Month Results

سال انتشار: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 98

فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JDMT-11-3_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 مهر 1401

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: This randomized clinical study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of composite and compomer materials in primary molars over two years. Methods: Children aged five to six years with at least two carious proximal surface primary molars were screened for resin-hybrid composite (Kerr Herculite Classic) and compomer (Dyract XP and R&D Series Nova) restorations. The restorations were clinically evaluated after ۳, ۶, ۹, ۱۲, ۱۵, ۱۸, and ۲۴ months using the modified United States Public Health Service criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square, McNemar, z-tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. P<۰.۰۱ and P<۰.۰۵ values were considered statistically significant according to the test used. Results: The survival rates were ۹۵.۳% for Kerr Herculite Classic resin-based composite, ۹۷.۶% for Dyract XP, and ۹۵.۴% for R&D Series Nova compomer restorations with no statistically significant differences (P>۰.۰۵). No significant differences were observed between the three materials concerning retention, color matching, marginal discoloration, anatomic form, marginal integrity, secondary caries, and surface texture (P>۰.۰۵). No statistically significant differences were also found between the effects of the cavity type, the tooth position in the arch, the age of the patient, the restorative material, and the lining material on the survival rates of the teeth (P>۰.۰۵). Restoration loss was higher in males than females, and a statistically significant relationship was observed in terms of gender (P=۰.۰۱۷). Restoration loss in the first primary molars (۸.۳%) was greater than that in the second primary molars (۶.۷%) (P=۰.۰۴۱). Conclusion: Both composite and compomer restorations were clinically successful over two years.

نویسندگان

Esra Oz

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey

Zuhal Kırzıoglu

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Radu F, Leon A, Petcu CL, Luca R. Glass-ionomer and ...
  • Dhar V, Hsu KL, Coll JA, et al. Evidence-based update ...
  • Gok Baba M, Kirzioglu Z, Ceyhan D. One-year clinical evaluation ...
  • Aslani F, Hejazi M, Baghalian A. Comparison of microleakage of ...
  • Tseveenjav B, Furuholm J, Mulic A, et al. Survival of ...
  • Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, et al. Restorations in ...
  • Rodrigues JA, Casagrande L, Araújo FB, Lenzi TL, Mariath AAS. ...
  • Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, et al. Clinical evaluation ...
  • Kirzioglu Z, Ceyhan D, Sengul F, Altun AC. Three-dimensional finite ...
  • Delgado AHS, Jamal H, Young A, Ashley P. Scoping review ...
  • Trachtenberg F, Maserejian NN, Soncini JA, Hayes C, Tavares M. ...
  • Pires CW, Pedrotti D, Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, Ziegelmann PK, ...
  • Vasileios S, Thodoris M, Nikolaos K. Tooth-coloured materials for Class ...
  • Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavvadia K. Clinical evaluation ...
  • Hse KM, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary ...
  • Ehlers V, Gran K, Callaway A, Azrak B, Ernst CP. ...
  • Gross LC, Griffen AL, Casamassimo PS. Compomers as Class II ...
  • Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, ...
  • Frankl L, Hellman I. Symposium on child analysis. The ego’s ...
  • Fanning EA. The relationship of dental caries and root resorption ...
  • Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Inter Dent J. ۱۹۸۰;۳۰(۴):۳۴۷–۳۵۸ ...
  • World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys – Basic Methods. ۴th ...
  • Qvist V, Manscher E, Teglers PT. Resin-modified and conventional glass ...
  • Kramer N, Garcia-Godoy F, Frankenberger R. Evaluation of resin composite ...
  • Santos AP, Moreira IK, Scarpelli AC, Pordeus IA, Paiva SM, ...
  • Pinto Gdos S, Oliveira LJ, Romano AR, et al. Longevity ...
  • Bücher K, Tautz A, Hickel R, Kühnisch J. Longevity of ...
  • Qvist V, Poulsen A, Teglers PT, Mjör IA. The longevity ...
  • Dos Santos MP, Passos M, Raggio LR, Maia LC. A ...
  • Imıcryl Dental, ‘’Nova Compomer Classic’’, Available form: https://www.imicryl.com/nova-compomer-classic_۱۲_u_en.html. Accessed on ...
  • Dermata A, Papageorgiou SN, Fragkou S, Kotsanos N. Comparison of ...
  • Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Restorative materials in the ...
  • Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. ...
  • Granath L, Schröder U, Sundin B. Clinical evaluation of preventive ...
  • Kupietzky A, Atia Joachim D, Tal E, Moskovitz M. Long-term ...
  • Ghaderi F, Mardani A. Clinical success rate of compomer and ...
  • Moore BK, Avery DR. Dental materials. In: McDonald RE, Avery ...
  • Sengul F, Gurbuz T. Clinical evaluation of restorative materials in ...
  • Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Placement and replacement of ...
  • Pummer A, Cieplik F, Nikolić M, Buchalla W, Hiller KA, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع