Antimicrobial Activity of Phytic Acid, Citric Acid, and EDTA with and without Propolis against Enterococcus Faecalis and Candida Albicans
سال انتشار: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 224
فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JDMT-11-3_008
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 مهر 1401
چکیده مقاله:
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the antimicrobial efficacy of chelation agents on Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and Candida albicans (C. albicans) when used alone or in combination with propolis. Methods: One hundred fifty mandibular premolar teeth were selected. Each canal was prepared with Reciproc R۲۵. The roots were then divided into two parts along their long axis (n=۳۰۰). For E. faecalis and C. albicans, the samples were divided into ۱۶ groups (۱۴ experimental and ۲ control) as follows: Group ۱A-۱B [۱۷% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)], Group ۲A-۲B [۱۰% Citric Acid (CA)], Group ۳A-۳B [۱% phytic acid/inositol hexaphosphate (IP۶)], Group ۴A-۴B (۱۷% EDTA+۸ mg/mL propolis), Group ۵A-۵B (۱۰% CA+۸ mg/mL propolis), Group ۶A-۶B (۱% IP۶+۸mg/mL propolis), Group ۷A-۷B (۸ mg/mL propolis), Control A-B (Dimethyl Sulfoxide). Each tooth was randomly irrigated with ۲ mL of one of the group solutions or dispersions for ۵ min, and the solutions were examined for the bactericidal effect. Results: For C. albicans, all groups showed less optical density (OD) than the control group (P<۰.۰۵). The propolis group and the IP۶ group had higher OD values than the CA group (P<۰.۰۵). For E. faecalis, on the other hand, significantly lower OD values were observed in the propolis+ CA group, compared to the CA and propolis groups (P<۰.۰۵). There was no significant difference between microbial growth among IP۶, EDTA, propolis+ CA, propolis+IP۶, and propolis+ EDTA groups (P>۰.۰۵). Conclusion: CA and IP۶ showed promising results in eliminating E. faecalis, one of the collective organisms responsible for failed root canals.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Merve Yeniçeri Özata
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey
Ömer Acer
Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey
Özlem Demirci
Department of General Biology, Faculty of Science, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey
Mehmet Çolak
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey
Gizem Akın Tartuk
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :