The Correlation and Reliability of Determining Non-dominant Leg Tests in Order to Assess Standing Balance

سال انتشار: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 119

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JRRS-13-5_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 4 بهمن 1401

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: Determining non-dominant leg in balance researches is important. Due to lack of specific test for determining non-dominant leg, the researchers had determined dominant leg, and then considered the opposite leg as non-dominant leg. Since, the used method had some drawbacks, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the correlation and reliability of tests for determining non-dominant leg.Materials and Methods: ۲۸ women were selected through purposeful sampling method among the students aged ۱۸-۲۵ years in Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran, and participated in this study. Field and laboratory tests included tests for determining preferred leg during stability task, functional test of stability task, single-leg stance balance tests, and weigh distribution on legs test during double leg stance. In order to study the manner of weight distribution on legs, a force plate and motion analysis system were used. MATLAB software was used for data analysis, and statistical analysis was done using SPSS software.Results: Highest correlation (r = ۰.۸۵) was related to two tests of hopping and landing from height (P = ۰.۰۰۱). There was also moderate correlation between hopping (r = ۰.۴۰) and landing from height (r = ۰.۴۷) tests and hopping distance test (P = ۰.۰۰۵). Results of reliability of tests revealed that only these three tests have high reliability. When method for calculating average values of trials was somehow modified, small but significant correlation appeared between single-leg stance test with landing (r = ۰.۲۸) and hopping skill distance (r = ۰.۲۹) tests (P = ۰.۰۲۰). There was no significant correlation between double leg stance test with stability task and single leg stance balance tests.Conclusion: Tests for determining non-dominant leg should be proportionate to task in research. Single-leg stance balance test used in the present study had not acceptable reliability, and based on the stability task and balance single-leg stance tests used in this study, manner of weigh distribution on legs at double leg stance condition cannot be shown.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

لیلا غزاله

Assistant Professor, Department of Exercise Physiology, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

امیرعلی جعفرنژادگرو

Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

بهرام صالح صدق پور

Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, School of Humanities, Shahid Rajaii Teacher Training University,Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Harris AJ. Lateral dominance and reading disability. J Learn Disabil ...
  • Papadatou-Pastou M. Handedness and language lateralization: Why are we right-handed ...
  • Velotta J, Weyer J, Ramirez A, Winstead J, Bahamonde R. ...
  • Bhise SA, Patil NK. Dominant and non-dominant leg activities in ...
  • Gentry V, Gabbard C. Foot-preference behavior: A developmental perspective. J ...
  • Clifford AM, Holder-Powell H. Postural control in healthy individuals. Clin ...
  • Kilroy EA, Crabtree OM, Crosby B, Parker A, Barfield WR. ...
  • Georgios G, Kollias N, Charalampos T, Konstantinos A. Over-representation of ...
  • Reed S, Jennings N, Nakamura J, Wilson A. Determining leg ...
  • van Melick N, Meddeler BM, Hoogeboom TJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden ...
  • Swearingen J, Lawrence E, Stevens J, Jackson C, Waggy C, ...
  • Yamamoto A, Sasagawa S, Oba N, Nakazawa K. Behavioral effect ...
  • Freitas SM, Duarte M. Joint coordination in young and older ...
  • Rougier PR. Relative contribution of the pressure variations under the ...
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power ۳: ...
  • Dorneles PP, de Silva FS, Mota CB. Comparison of postural ...
  • de Almeida IA, Terra MB, de Oliveira MR, Silva Junior ...
  • Fong SSM, Chung LMY, Bae YH, Vackova D, Ma AWW, ...
  • Samaei A, Bakhtiary AH, Elham F, Rezasoltani A. Effects of ...
  • Sziver E, Nagy E, Preszner-Domjan A, Posa G, Horvath G, ...
  • Bahamonde R, Weyer J, Velotta J, Middleton A. Effects of ...
  • Clark MS. The Unilateral Forefoot Balance Test: Reliability and validity ...
  • Chapman JP, Chapman LJ, Allen JJ. The measurement of foot ...
  • Ludwig O, Simon S, Piret J, Becker S, Marschall F. ...
  • Springer BA, Marin R, Cyhan T, Roberts H, Gill NW. ...
  • Winter DA. Human balance and posture control during standing and ...
  • Ghazaleh L, Anbarian M, Damavandi M. Prediction of body center ...
  • Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; ۱۹۷۸ ...
  • Alonso AC, Brech GC, Bourquin AM, Greve JM. The influence ...
  • Tsang WW, Hui-Chan CW. Static and dynamic balance control in ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع