بررسی رویکرد نیک تراکاکیس به ضدتئودیسه در قیاس با متاتئودیسه و نقد تئودیسه

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

• Bishop, John. ۲۰۱۸. “Response to Trakakis.” In The Problem of ...
• Davies, Brian. ۲۰۰۶. The Reality of God and the Problem ...
• Oppy, Graham. ۲۰۱۸. “Response to Trakakis.” In The Problem of ...
• Peterson, Michael L. Hasker William Reichenbach Bruce R. Basinger David. ...
• Stump, Eleonore. ۲۰۱۸. “Response to Trakakis.” In The Problem of ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۰۳a. “Evil and the Complexity of History: A ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۰۳b. “God, Gratuitous Evil, and van Inwagen’s Attempt ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۰۳c. “On the Alleged Failure of Free Will ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۰۴. “Second Thoughts on the Alleged Failure of ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۰۵. “Is Theism Capable of Accounting for Any ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۰۶a. “A Third (Meta-)Critique.” Sophia ۴۵ (۲): ۱۳۹–۴۲ ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۰۶b. “Does Hard Determinism Render the Problem of ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۰۶c. The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۰۶d. “Why There Is Reason to Remain Sceptical ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۰۸a. The End of Philosophy of Religion. New ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۰۸b. “Theodicy: The Solution to the Problem of ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۱۷. “Anti-Theodicy.” Pp. ۱۲۴-۱۴۴, in The Cambridge Companion ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۱۸a. “Anti-Theodicy.” In The Problem of Evil: Eight ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۱۸b. “Reply to Bishop.” In The Problem of ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۱۸c. “Reply to Oppy.” In The Problem of ...
• Trakakis, Nick. ۲۰۱۸d. “Reply to Stump.” In The Problem of ...
نمایش کامل مراجع