A modification of technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) through fuzzy similarity method (a numerical example of the personnel selection)

سال انتشار: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 145

فایل این مقاله در 15 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_APRIE-10-2_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 5 اردیبهشت 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) is well known nowadays as a methodology in which a set of techniques are integrated to evaluate a set of alternatives with specified criteria for the purpose of selecting or ranking. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is well-established methodology frequently considered in MCDM analyses. TOPSIS has a sound logic that represents the rationale of human choice and is a scalar value simultaneously taking into account both the best and worst alternatives. Moreover, it has a simple computation process that could be easily programmed and finally it has the ability to rank alternatives on attributes to be visualized on a polyhedron, in at least two dimensions. Despite the advantages of this method, the process of ranking alternative according to related criteria may need more consideration. Typically, there are contributions in this article. First, a new similarity measure has been introduced followed by a modification applied to TOPSIS analyses. Second, the modified similarity technique was subsequently extended in the fuzzy context to cope with the uncertainty inherently existing in human judgments. A numerical example of the personnel selection was presented to demonstrate the possible application of the proposed method in human resource management. The outcome of applying fuzzy similarity method showed a significant distinction in ranking alternatives compered to TOPSIS method. Therefore, the modification is sound to be a proper solution.

نویسندگان

Elham Ebrahimi

Department of Human Resources Management, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran.

Mohammad Reza Fathi

Department of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Iran.

Seyed Mohammad Sobhani

Department of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Özcan, T., Çelebi, N., & Esnaf, Ş. (۲۰۱۱). Comparative analysis ...
  • Düğenci, M. (۲۰۱۶). A new distance measure for interval valued ...
  • Efe, B. (۲۰۱۶). An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision ...
  • Zhang, X., Xu, Z., & Wang, H. (۲۰۱۵). Heterogeneous multiple ...
  • Zhang, Z., Wang, C., & Tian, X. (۲۰۱۵). Multi-criteria group ...
  • Deng, H. (۲۰۰۷). A similarity-based approach to ranking multicriteria alternatives. ...
  • Hwang, C., & Yoon, K. (۱۹۸۱). Multiple attribute decision making: ...
  • Lima-Junior, F. R., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (۲۰۱۶). Combining ...
  • Kusumawardani, R. P., & Agintiara, M. (۲۰۱۵). Application of fuzzy ...
  • Patil, S. K., & Kant, R. (۲۰۱۴). A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS ...
  • Mandic, K., Delibasic, B., Knezevic, S., & Benkovic, S. (۲۰۱۴). ...
  • Amiri, M., Zandieh, M., Vahdani, B., Soltani, R., & Roshanaei, ...
  • Mir, M. A., Ghazvinei, P. T., Sulaiman, N. M. N., ...
  • Kim, G., Park, C. S., & Yoon, K. P. (۱۹۹۷). ...
  • Pamucar, D., & Cirovic, G. (۲۰۱۵). The selection of transport ...
  • Žižović, M., Pamučar, D., Albijanić, M., Chatterjee, P., & Pribićević, ...
  • Yu, P. L. (۱۹۷۳). A class of solutions for group ...
  • Zelrny, M. (۱۹۷۳). Compromise Programming. Multiple criteria decision making, ۷۴(۱), ...
  • Lin, C. T., & Chen, Y. T. (۲۰۰۴). Bid/no-bid decision-making–a ...
  • Tai, W. S., & Chen, C. T. (۲۰۰۹). A new ...
  • Wang, R. C., & Chuu, S. J. (۲۰۰۴). Group decision-making ...
  • Lee, S. H. (۲۰۱۰). Using fuzzy AHP to develop intellectual ...
  • Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. (۲۰۰۷). Developing global ...
  • Karabašević, D., Stanujkić, D., & Urošević, S. (۲۰۱۵). The MCDM ...
  • Polychroniou, P. V., & Giannikos, I. (۲۰۰۹). A fuzzy multicriteria ...
  • Widianta, M. M. D., Rizaldi, T., Setyohadi, D. P. S., ...
  • Baležentis, A., Baležentis, T., & Brauers, W. K. (۲۰۱۲). Personnel ...
  • Dursun, M., & Karsak, E. (۲۰۱۰). A fuzzy MCDM approach ...
  • Güngör, Z., Serhadlıoğlu, G., & Kesen, S. (۲۰۰۹). A fuzzy ...
  • Zhang, S., & Liu, S. (۲۰۱۱). A GRA-based intuitionistic fuzzy ...
  • Wang, C., & Wu, H. (۲۰۱۶). A novel framework to ...
  • Sun, C. C. (۲۰۱۰). A performance evaluation model by integrating ...
  • Garg, H., & Arora, R. (۲۰۲۰). TOPSIS method based on ...
  • Keikha, A., Garg, H., & Mishmast Nehi, H. (۲۰۲۱). An ...
  • Garg, H., Keikha, A., & Mishmast Nehi, H. (۲۰۲۰). Multiple-attribute ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع