ورود
مقالات فارسیISIکنفرانسهاژورنالها

Evaluation of Dose Calculation Algorithms Accuracy for Eclipse, PCRT۳D, and Monaco Treatment Planning Systems Using IAEA TPS commissioning tests in a Heterogeneous Phantom

محل انتشار: مجله فیزیک پزشکی ایران، دوره: 16، شماره: 4
سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 72

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:
https://civilica.com/doc/1738927

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJMP-16-4_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 5 شهریور 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: The accuracy of dose calculation algorithm (DCA) is highly considered in the radiotherapy sequences. This study aims at assessing the accuracy of five dose calculation algorithms in tissue inhomogeneity corrections, based on the International Atomic Energy Agency TEC-DOC ۱۵۸۳. Material and Methods: A heterogeneous phantom was scanned using computed tomography and tests were planned on three-dimensional treatment planning systems (۳D TPSs) based on IAEA TEC-DOC ۱۵۸۳.Doseswere measured for ۶- and ۱۸-MV photon beams with ion chambers and then the deviation between measured and calculated TPS doses were reported. The evaluated five DCAs include Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm employed by Monaco, pencil beam convolution (PBC) and anisotropic analytical algorithms (AAA) employed by Eclipse and Superposition (SP), and Clarkson algorithms employed by PCRT۳D TPSs. Results: In Clarkson algorithm, low and high energy photons indicated ۷.۱% and ۱۴.۸% deviations out of agreement criteria, respectively. The SP, AAA, and PBC algorithms indicated ۰.۹%, ۷.۴%, and ۱۳.۸% for low energy photon and ۹.۵%, ۲۱.۳%, and ۲۳.۲% for high energy photon deviations out of agreement criteria, respectively. However, MC algorithm showed ۱.۸% and less than ۱% deviations at high and low energy photons, respectively. Conclusion: The DCAs had different levels of accuracy in TPSs. Some simple DCAs, such as Clarkson, showed large deviations in some cases. Therefore, the transition to more advanced algorithms, such as MC would be desirable, particularly for the calculation in the presence of inhomogeneity or high energy beams.

کلیدواژه ها:

Dose ، Algorithm ، Treatment Planning ، Radiation Therapy

نویسندگان

Nasibeh Kavousi

Department of Medical Physics and Medical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Hassan Ali Nedaie

radiotherapy oncology department, cancer research centre, Tehran university of medical sciences,Tehran,Iran

Somayeh Gholami

۱. Department of Medical Physics and Medical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ۲. Radiotherapy Oncology Research Centre, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

mahbod Esfahani

Radiotherapy Oncology Research Centre, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Ghazale Geraily

Department of Medical Physics, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • ReferencesLi J, Zhang T. Implementation of convolution/superposition model of photon ...
  • Wieslander E. Verification of dose calculation algorithms in treatment planning ...
  • Robinson D. Inhomogeneity correction and the analytic anisotropic algorithm. Journal ...
  • Assessment of Dose Calculation Accuracy of TiGRT Treatment Planning System for Physical Wedged fields in Radiotherapy [مقاله ژورنالی]
  • Scott JA. Photon, electron, proton and neutron interaction data for ...
  • Cheng CW, Das IJ, Tang W, Chang S, Tsai JS, ...
  • Paelinck L, Reynaert N, Thierens H, De Neve W, De ...
  • Mesbahi A, Zergoug I. Dose calculations for lung inhomogeneity in ...
  • El-Khatib EE, Evans M, Pla M, Cunningham JR. Evaluation of ...
  • Ekstrand KE, Barnes WH. Pitfalls in the use of high ...
  • Garcı́a-Vicente F, Miñambres Á, Jerez I, Modolell I, Pérez L, ...
  • Van Esch A, Tillikainen L, Pyykkonen J, Tenhunen M, Helminen ...
  • Knoos T, Ceberg C, Weber L, Nilsson P. The dosimetric ...
  • Aspradakis MM, Morrison RH, Richmond ND, Steele A. Experimental verification ...
  • Kappas C, Rosenwald JC. Quality control of inhomogeneity correction algorithms ...
  • Venselaar J, Welleweerd H. Application of a test package in ...
  • Carrasco P, Jornet N, Duch MA, Weber L, Ginjaume M, ...
  • Khan FM ,Gibbons JP. Khan's the physics of radiation therapy. ...
  • I. A. E. Agency. Commissioning and Quality Assurance of Computerized ...
  • TecDoc IA. ۱۵۸۳: commissioning of radiotherapy treatment planning systems: testing ...
  • Asnaashari K, Nodehi MR, Mahdavi SR, Gholami S, Khosravi HR. ...
  • Miften M, Wiesmeyer M, Kapur A, Ma CM. Comparison of ...
  • Knöös T, Wieslander E, Cozzi L, Brink C, Fogliata A, ...
  • Golestani A, Houshyari M, Mostaar A, Arfaie AJ. Evaluation of ...
  • Ding W, Johnston PN, Wong TP, Bubb IF. Investigation of ...
  • Rutonjski L, Petrović B, Baucal M, Teodorović M, Čudić O, ...
  • Yorke E, Harisiadis L, Wessels B, Aghdam H, Altemus R. ...
  • Klein EE, Morrison A, Purdy JA, Graham MV, Matthews J. ...
  • Woon YL, Heng SP, Wong JH, Ung NM. Comparison of ...
  • Zhuang T, Djemil T, Qi P, Magnelli A, Stephans K, ...
  • Gershkevitsh E, Schmidt R, Velez G, Miller D, Korf E, ...
  • Alam R, Ibbott GS, Pourang R, Nath R. Application of ...
  • Schiefer H, Fogliata A, Nicolini G, Cozzi L, Seelentag WW, ...
  • Asnaashari K, Gholami SO, Khosravi HR. Lessons learnt from errors ...
    • نمایش کامل مراجع