ورود
مقالات فارسیISIکنفرانسهاژورنالها

Designing Health Literacy Measurement Tools: A Critical Review of Common Paths and Probable Mistakes

محل انتشار: فصلنامه سواد سلامت، دوره: 8، شماره: 3
سال انتشار: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 89

فایل این مقاله در 13 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:
https://civilica.com/doc/1768007

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JHL-8-3_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 4 مهر 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Background and Objective: Measuring concepts such as health literacy, either generally or specifically, in different populations requires the use of existing standard instruments or the development of new ones by the researcher. The study was conducted to critical review of common methodologies for instrument development in the health literacy. Materials and Methods:  This review article examines health literacy measurement tools with two objectives: ۱) methodological review of tool design ۲) review of the items used in each tool by posing this question (validity review) "Do the items measure what is intended in relation to the concept of health literacy and its dimensions?”. In order to access the health literacy tools, first was referred to the site "Health Literacy Tool Shed".۱۰% of the available tools (۲۰ item) were randomly included in the study for a deep and detailed review. Results: Finding showed, researchers employed three different approaches to the development of measurement instruments; ۱) Review of literature or used the already existing instruments, ۲) The qualitative approach to explain a concept and embrace it from different dimensions as well as construct the items and ۳) Mix-method approach (a mixture the previous two approaches). Two mistakes include ۱) interpretation error (error of qualitative content analysis, creation of categories and sub-categories from codes and meaning units) and ۲) program error (error of exploiting subcategories and categories in designing and generating items and different parts of tools) reported. Conclusions: Paying attention and considering what was indicated regarding different approaches and paths as well as processes and methods can preserve researches to a large extent from the main problem that is the collection of inaccurate data due to instruments with low validity and reliability.

کلیدواژه ها:

Health Literacy ، Tool ، Methodology ، Critical review ، Measurement

نویسندگان

Sakineh Rakhshanderou

Assistant Professor of Health Education and Promotion Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Safety Environmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research Center Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Ali Safari-Moradabadi

Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Health Research Center for Health, Safety and Environment Alborz University of Medical Sciences

Fatemeh Bahrambeygi

PhD Student in Health Education & Health Promotion, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Mohtasham Ghaffari

Professor of Health Education and Promotion Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Safety Environmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research Center Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Sorensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۱۸۶/۱۴۷۱-۲۴۵۸-۱۲-۸۰PMid:۲۲۲۷۶۶۰۰ PMCid:PMC۳۲۹۲۵۱۵۲. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Health Literacy; ...
  • Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a ...
  • Jafari A, Zadehahmad Z, Armanmehr V, Talebi M, Tehrani H. ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۰۳۸/s۴۱۵۹۸-۰۲۳-۳۲۳۴۸-۳PMid:۳۷۰۱۲۲۷۱ PMCid:PMC۱۰۰۷۰۴۹ ...
  • literacy. Iomuroh. Measures of health literacy: workshop summary. Washington (DC): ...
  • Ghanbari S, Ramezankhani A, Montazeri A, Mehrabi Y. Health literacy ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۳۷۱/journal.pone.۰۱۴۹۲۰۲PMid:۲۶۸۸۱۹۳۳ PMCid:PMC۴۷۵۵۵۷ ...
  • Tavousi M, Ebadi M, Fattahi E, Jahangiry L, Hashemi A, ...
  • Taghizadeh Z, Ebadi A, Montazeri A, Shahvari Z, Tavousi M, ...
  • Ebadi A, Taghizadeh Z, Montazeri A, Shahvari Z, Tavousi M, ...
  • Hinkin TR. A review of scale development practices in the ...
  • Ghaffari M, Rakhshanderou S, Ramezankhani A, Mehrabi Y, Safari-Moradabadi A. ...
  • Morgado FFR, Meireles JFF, Neves CM, Amaral ACS, Ferreira MEC. ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۱۸۶/s۴۱۱۵۵-۰۱۶-۰۰۵۷-۱PMid:۳۲۰۲۵۹۵۷ PMCid:PMC۶۹۶۶۹۶ ...
  • Harnett S. Health literacy tool shed: a source for validated ...
  • Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۱۸۶/۱۴۷۱-۲۴۵۸-۱۳-۶۵۸PMid:۲۳۸۵۵۵۰۴ PMCid:PMC۳۷۱۸۶۵ ...
  • Chinn D, McCarthy C. All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale ...
  • Tavousi M, Haeri-Mehrizi A, Rakhshani F, Rafiefar S, Soleymanian A, ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۱۸۶/s۱۲۸۸۹-۰۲۰-۰۸۷۸۷-۲PMid:۳۲۳۹۷۹۷۰ PMCid:PMC۷۲۱۶۵۵ ...
  • Haun J, Luther S, Dodd V, Donaldson P. Measurement variation ...
  • Chew LD, Bradley KA, Boyko EJ. Brief questions to identify ...
  • Nakayama K, Osaka W, Togari T, Ishikawa H, Yonekura Y, ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۱۸۶/s۱۲۸۸۹-۰۱۵-۱۸۳۵-xPMid:۲۶۰۰۱۳۸۵ PMCid:PMC۴۴۹۱۸۶ ...
  • Manganello JA, DeVellis RF, Davis TC, Schottler-Thal C. Development of ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۱۷۹/۱۷۵۳۸۰۷۶۱۵Y.۰۰۰۰۰۰۰۰۱۶PMid:۲۷۶۵۶۲۵۷ PMCid:PMC۵۰۲۷۶۴ ...
  • Dumenci L, Matsuyama R, Riddle DL, Cartwright LA, Perera RA, ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۰۸۰/۱۰۸۱۰۷۳۰.۲۰۱۴.۹۴۳۳۷۷PMid:۲۵۳۱۵۵۹۴ PMCid:PMC۴۲۸۳۲۰ ...
  • Sabbahi DA, Lawrence HP, Limeback H, Rootman I. Development and ...
  • Osborn CY, Wallston KA, Shpigel A, Cavanaugh K, Kripalani S, ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۰۱۶/j.pec.۲۰۱۳.۰۱.۰۰۱PMid:۲۳۴۳۳۶۳۵ PMCid:PMC۳۶۴۴۳۴ ...
  • Zhang X-H, Thumboo J, Fong K-Y, Li S-C. Development and ...
  • Ousseine YM, Rouquette A, Bouhnik A-D, Rigal L, Ringa V, ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۱۸۶/s۴۱۶۸۷-۰۱۸-۰۰۲۷-۸PMid:۲۹۷۵۷۳۱۹ PMCid:PMC۵۹۳۴۹۲ ...
  • Steckelberg A, Hülfenhaus C, Kasper J, Rost J, Mühlhauser I. ...
  • Teufl L, Vrtis D, Felder-Puig R. QUIGK-K: Quiz zur Erhebung ...
  • Koo M, Norman CD, Hsiao-Mei C. Psychometric evaluation of a ...
  • Pan FC, Su C-L, Chen C-H. Development of a health ...
  • White III RO, Osborn CY, Gebretsadik T, Kripalani S, Rothman ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۰۸۹/dia.۲۰۱۱.۰۰۷۰PMid:۲۱۷۱۴۶۷۴ PMCid:PMC۳۱۶۰۲۶ ...
  • Nolte S, Osborne RH, Dwinger S, Elsworth GR, Conrad ML, ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۳۷۱/journal.pone.۰۱۷۲۳۴۰PMid:۲۸۲۳۴۹۸۷ PMCid:PMC۵۳۲۵۲۵ ...
  • Rouquette A, Nadot T, Labitrie P, Van den Broucke S, ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۳۷۱/journal.pone.۰۲۰۸۰۹۱PMid:۳۰۵۲۱۵۵۲ PMCid:PMC۶۲۸۳۶۲ ...
  • Doustmohammadian A, Omidvar N, Keshavarz-Mohammadi N, Abdollahi M, Amini M, ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۳۷۱/journal.pone.۰۱۷۹۱۹۶PMid:۲۸۶۵۴۶۴۶ PMCid:PMC۵۴۸۷۰۱ ...
  • Carpenter S. Ten steps in scale development and reporting: a ...
  • Montazeri A, Tavousi M, Rakhshani F, Seyed Ali A, Jahangiri ...
  • Liu T, Su X, Li N, Sun J, Ma G, ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۳۷۱/journal.pone.۰۲۴۴۱۹۷PMid:۳۳۴۰۶۱۰۵ PMCid:PMC۷۷۸۷۴۴ ...
    • نمایش کامل مراجع