Evaluating educational services using TOPSIS method with eigne value methodology based on GIS

سال انتشار: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 61

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJNAA-14-9_023

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 24 مهر 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Choosing the right site for creating educational services is a complex problem that involves evaluating many criteria, therefore, there is a need for a multi criteria decision-making tool that can make a reliable, coherent decision. The aim of this paper is to develop a methodological plan that can help decision-makers in determining the locations of the most important schools to build new schools by adopting seven basic criteria: The population’s actual need for schools, the distance between the school and the main street, the proximity to health centers, the number of students in each school, the number of teachers in each school, the proportion of teachers to students, the number of students in each class(.that were selected by a group of specialists and experts. The use of the (Eigen value) method to calculate the relative importance of these criteria, combined with the A multi-criteria decision-making technique (TOPSIS), The final results showed that the relative priority of the criteria is respectively) ۴۶.۶%, ۱۵.۹%, ۱۵.۰%, ۵.۵%, ۴.۱۰%, ۸.۸%, ۴.۲%, (And the percentage of schools that were in the four categories, respectively (۶%,۱۰%,۱۳%,۲۶%), One of the most important recommendations is to bridge the deficit experienced by the educational services provided within the study area by adopting the results that were reached above, by choosing sites to build new schools that take into account the basic standards.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Noor Abood

Collage of Economic and Administration, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq

Omar Alashari

Collage of Economic and Administration, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • M.Z. Abidin, R. Rusli and A.M. Shariff, Technique for order ...
  • H.S. Alsamaray, AHP as multi-criteria decision making technique, empirical study ...
  • S. Bhattacharya and V. Raju, A Condorcet voting theory based ...
  • D. Butler, Facts about Eigenvalues, Textbook, University of California, San ...
  • M. Greenacre, Measures of distance between samples: Euclidean, Multivar. Anal. ...
  • C.C. Hung and L.H. Chen, A fuzzy TOPSIS decision making ...
  • C.L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Methods for multiple attribute decision ...
  • G.R. Jahanshahloo, F. Hosseinzadeh Lofti and M. Izadikhah, An algorithmic ...
  • H.K. Khanna, D.D. Sharma and S.C. Laroiya, Identifying and ranking ...
  • Y. Meng, J. Malczewski and S. Boroushaki, A GIS-based multicriteria ...
  • D. Ozturk and F. Batuk, Technique for order preference by ...
  • Z. Pavic and V. Novoselac, Notes on TOPSIS method, Int. ...
  • D. Rojas and J.C. Loubier, Analytical hierarchy process coupled with ...
  • E. Roszkowska, Multi-criteria decision making models by applying the TOPSIS ...
  • A.Z. Sarraf, A. Mohaghar and H. Bazargani, Developing TOPSIS method ...
  • C.O.S. Sorzano, Eigenvalues and eigenvectors, Biomed. Eng. ۲۰۱۳ ...
  • K. Teknomo, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) tutorial, Revoledu ۶ (۲۰۰۶), ...
  • O.S. Vaidya and S. Kumar, Analytic hierarchy process: An overview ...
  • E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis and J. Tamosaitiene, Construction risk assessment ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع