Comparative Study of Design Forces of Cast-In-Place Reinforced Concrete Diaphragms in Different Standards
سال انتشار: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 59
متن کامل این مقاله منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل مقاله (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
NCCICI15_030
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 7 آبان 1402
چکیده مقاله:
Diaphragms are horizontal elements of the lateral force-resisting systems in structures. In addition to resisting the gravity loads, reinforced concrete diaphragms play a vital role in transmitting seismic loads to vertical force-resisting elements such as columns, shear walls or braces. It is necessary to design the diaphragms in such a way to avoid any disturbances in the load path. Various approaches with different procedures are provided in standards and codes for calculating diaphragm design forces. One of these differences is the effect of the type of diaphragm on determining the design force. For example, in the alternative method provided in the American loading code force reduction coefficients according to the diaphragm type are suggested, while in the general method of the same code and in the method provided in the New Zealand seismic loading standard for all diaphragms consider only one force calculation method. In this article, the methods for calculating the design force of cast-in-place reinforced concrete diaphragms in the loading standard of the United States and New Zealand as the advanced standards in seismic design of structures are introduced and compared.
کلیدواژه ها:
Alternative Method ، Loading code of the United States ، General Method ، New Zealand Seismic Loading Standards ، Cast-In-Place Reinforced Concrete Diaphragms
نویسندگان
Amin Mosallanejad
Master’s Student of Earthquake Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran
Mohammad Amir Najafgholipour
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran
Arsalan Niroomandi
PHD Structural Engineering, Department of Civil and Natural Resources, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand