A Review of the Academic Engagement of Medical Students in Kerman University of Medical Sciences Iran ۲۰۱۱۲۰۱۲

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 46

فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SDME-12-1_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 21 آذر 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Background & Objective: The concept of active engagement or academic engagement is a certain understanding of the relationship between students and the university The university is an environment that provides learning opportunities that will lead to student learning The nature and level of learning depends on the students way of using their environmental resources Positive engagement and an interactive supportive academic environment are essential elements in success in the learning process On the other hand isolation alienation and passiveness of students results in their academic failure The aim of the present study was to investigate academic engagement of medical students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences Iran in ۲۰۱۱۲۰۱۲ In this study ۲ domains of academic engagement were investigated (active and participatory learning and level of academic challenge)   Methods: In this descriptiveanalytical crosssectional study all medical students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences were recruited using stratified random sampling method The data collection tool was the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)   Results: In this study ۲۱۱ medical students from different academic years with the average age of ۲۲۶ ± ۳۱ were enrolled The mean active engagement score of the students was ۹۸۶۴ ± ۳۲۳۳ Active and cooperative learning was at a significant level based on all demographic variables except employment The active and cooperative learning of male students differed significantly from that of female students married students from single students different academic years and native from local students Moreover students who were members of one of the academic centers had significantly higher active and participatory learning scores Mean active and participatory learning and level of academic challenge were ۱۷۴ ± ۵۶ and ۲۱۷ ± ۷۱ respectively Both domains were reported as unsatisfactory among students   Conclusion: The results showed the unsatisfactory academic engagment status of the students of the Kerman University of Medical Sciences Thus it is hoped that with future planning to use more modern teaching methods which have a higher level of academic challenges and active and collaborative learning and by the appropriate support of the university university staff and faculty members we are able to take steps toward the improvement of academic engagement and thereby student success

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Esmat Noohi

Ph.D. in Nursing Education, M.Sc. in Medical Education, Assistant Professor, Department of Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Physiology Research Center, Medical Education Development Center Kerman University of Me

Hamideh Montazeri

M.Sc. in Medical Education, Medical Education Development Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Mostafa Shokohi

M.Sc. in Epidemiology, Center for Health Research in Modeling, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Rattle CF, Larose S, Guay F, Senecal C. Perceptions of ...
  • Roshanaei M. Family and Personal Factors that Influence Students Adaptation ...
  • Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. ۲۳ (Part ۲): ...
  • Audin K DJ, Barkham M. University Quality of Life and ...
  • Pimparyon P, Roff S, McAleer S, Poonchai B, Pemba S. ...
  • Clarke J, Dimartino J. A Personal Prescription for engagement. Principal ...
  • Chapman E. Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical ...
  • Krause KL, Coates H. Students’ Engagement in First-year University. Assessment ...
  • Kuh GD. What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE: ...
  • Miller RL, Rycek RF, Fritson K. The effects of high ...
  • Khazaei, M. Rezaei. M Survey .Medical students' personal characteristics and ...
  • Moniri R, Ghalebtarash H, Mussavi Gh. The Reasons of educational ...
  • Talaee A, Hekmatpou D. Explain medical students of Arak University ...
  • Obeidi N. Effective factors on the communication between students and ...
  • Ghadami A, Salehi B, Sajadi Sh, Naji H. Students' Points ...
  • Aliasgharpour M, Monjamed Z, Bahrani N. Factors Affecting Students' Evaluation ...
  • Wang MT, Holocombe R. Adolescents' perceptions of classroom environment, school ...
  • Finn JD, Rock DA. Academic success among students at risk ...
  • Ratelle CF۱, Larose S, Guay F, Senécal C. Perceptions of ...
  • Noohi E, Abaszadeh A, Maddah B. University engagement in nursing ...
  • National Youth Organization affiliated to Presidency of The Islamic Republic ...
  • Carini RM, Kuh GD, Klein SP. Student engagement and student ...
  • Junco R, Heiberger G, Loken E. The effect of Twitter ...
  • Pike GR, Kuh GD, McCormick AC, Ethington CA, Smart JC. ...
  • Miller RL, Rycek RF, Fritson K. The effects of high ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع