ورود
مقالات فارسیISIکنفرانسهاژورنالها

Psychometric Features of the Patient Evaluation Measure in Iranian Individuals With Wrist Disorders

محل انتشار: مجله توانبخشی ایرانیان، دوره: 21، شماره: 1
سال انتشار: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 59

فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:
https://civilica.com/doc/1861926

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IRJU-21-1_015

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 دی 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Objectives: The patient evaluation measure (PEM) evaluates the hand health profile. Having an appropriate measurement tool for the assessment of hand outcomes in Iranian individuals with wrist disorders is essential for clinical and research settings. The objective of the present study was to examine the psychometric features of the PEM in Iranian individuals with wrist disorders. Methods: Ninety individuals with wrist disorders were recruited. Hand outcome was evaluated with the PEM, quick-disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Q-DASH), visual analogue scale-pain (VAS-P), and JAMAR hand-grip dynamometer. The PEM was translated into Persian. Face, content, and convergent validity was examined. Also, acceptability, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and absolute reliability were calculated. Results: All questions had an item impact score and CVR score of >۱.۵ and >۰.۴۲, respectively. All questions except for question ۱ (CVI=۰.۷۶) and ۱۰ (CVI=۰.۷۳) of section B had a CVI score of <۰.۷۹. After changes were applied, the CVI score for these questions (question ۱=۰.۸۳; question ۱۰=۰.۸۷) reached acceptable criteria. The total score of the PEM showed a significant moderate correlation with Q-DASH (ρ=۰.۵۱; P<۰.۰۰۱) and VAS-P (ρ=۰.۵۵; P<۰.۰۰۱) and an insignificant weak correlation with grip strength (ρ=-۰.۱۱; P>۰.۰۵). Floor and ceiling effects were ۰% for the total PEM score. The Cronbach’s α and intra-class correlation values were ۰.۷۲-۰.۸۷ and ۰.۹۶-۰.۹۸, respectively.  Discussion: The present study suggests that the PEM has acceptable validity and reliability for measuring performance and satisfaction in individuals with wrist disorders. This measure might contribute as an outcome measure in research and routine assessments in clinical practice.

کلیدواژه ها:

Outcome assessment ، Reliability and validity ، Psychometrics ، Wrist injuries

نویسندگان

Mahsa Meimandi

Department of Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Research Center, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Akram Azad

Department of Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Research Center, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Golara Niketeghad

Department of Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Research Center, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Laleh Lajevardi

Department of Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Research Center, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Simmen B, Kolling C, Herren D. (iv) The management of ...
  • Smith J. Fundamentals of hand therapy: Clinical reasoning and treatment ...
  • Abolfazli M, Lajevardi L, Mirzaei L, Abdorazaghi HA, Azad A, ...
  • Van Eck M, Lameijer C, El Moumni M. Structural validity ...
  • Taylor J, Kersten P. The patient-rated wrist and hand Evaluation: ...
  • Schoneveld K, Wittink H, Takken T. Clinimetric evaluation of measurement ...
  • Hobby J, Watts C, Elliot D. Validity and responsiveness of ...
  • Bindra R, Dias JJ, Heras-Palau C, Amadio P, Chung K, ...
  • Cooper C. Fundamentals: hand therapy concepts and treatment techniques. Fundamentals ...
  • Squire R. Fundamentals of hand therapy: clinical reasoning and treatment ...
  • Dias J, Bhowal B, Wildin C, Thompson J. Assessing the ...
  • Macey A, Burke F, Abbott K, Barton N, Bradbury E, ...
  • Cartwright-Terry M, Miah A, Savage R, editors. USING THE PATIENT ...
  • Piotuch B, Żyluk A. An Assessment of the Usefulness of ...
  • Dias J, Sayeed L, Bhowal B, editors. MCID for the ...
  • Papiez K, Trybus M, Stepańczak B, Łoboda K, Pokrowiecki W, ...
  • Forward D, Sithole J, Davis T. The internal consistency and ...
  • Watts A, Greenstock M, Cole R. Outcome following the rehabilitation ...
  • Foroughan M, Jafari Z, Shirin Bayan P, Ghaem Magham Farahani ...
  • Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research: lippincott williams ...
  • Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of ...
  • Ebrahimzadeh MH, Moradi A, Vahedi E, Kachooei AR, Birjandinejad A. ...
  • Sriwatanakul K, Kelvie W, Lasagna L, Calimlim JF, Weis OF, ...
  • Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual ...
  • Coldham F, Lewis J, Lee H. The reliability of one ...
  • Aaronson N, Acquadro C, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bucquet D, ...
  • Lacasse Y, Godbout C, Series F. Health-related quality of life ...
  • Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology. ...
  • Polit DF, Yang F. Measurement and the measurement of change: ...
  • Simon SD. Statistical evidence in medical trials: What do the ...
  • Piedmont RL. Inter-item correlations. Encyclopedia of quality of life and ...
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt ...
  • Dorich J, Cornwall R. Results of a grip strengthening protocol ...
  • Dias J, Rajan R, Thompson J. Which questionnaire is best? ...
  • Sharma R, Dias J. Validity and reliability of three generic ...
    • نمایش کامل مراجع