Cervical ripening before surgical evacuation of first-trimester pregnancy: a comparison between misoprostol and trinitroglycerin

سال انتشار: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 47

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JCOMS-3-3_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 بهمن 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: Termination of pregnancy through curettage in the first trimester requires cervical ripening (CR) which can be induced by medicinal or mechanical methods. In the pharmaceutical method, vaginal administration of misoprostol, as well as vaginal trinitroglycerin (TNG), has been shown to induce effective CR. This study was conducted with the aim of comparing vaginal misoprostol and vaginal TNG in the CR of women candidates for the first-trimester curettage.Materials and Methods: This double-blind clinical trial study was conducted on ۱۶۸ pregnant women with a gestational age of less than ۱۴ weeks who were candidates for curettage. Participants were randomly divided into two groups receiving vaginally either TNG (۴۰۰ µgr)(n=۸۷) or misoprostol (۴۰۰ µgr) (n=۸۱). Then, the state of CR and the need for mechanical dilatation were compared between the two groups. Also, the presence of any side effects caused by drug use was determined.Results: The percentage of CR in the misoprostol group (۶۷.۹%) was significantly higher than in the TNG group (۳۲.۲%) (P<۰.۰۰۱). Therefore, the need for mechanical dilatation in the TNG group (۶۶.۷%) was significantly higher compared with the misoprostol group (۳۲.۱%) (P<۰.۰۰۱). Also, the rate of complications like diarrhea (۹.۹%) and abdominal pain (۷.۴%) in the misoprostol group was significantly higher than in the TNG group (۰%). However, headache in the TNG group (۳۴.۵%) was significantly higher than in the misoprostol group (۰%) (P>۰.۰۰۱). Generally, the rate of complications in the TNG group (۳۵.۶%) was significantly higher compared with the misoprostol group (۱۳.۶%) (P>۰.۰۰۱).Conclusion: Vaginally Misoprostol is more effective than vaginally TNG on CR of first-trimester curettage as well as it significantly reduces the need for mechanical dilatation of the cervix.Introduction: Termination of pregnancy through curettage in the first trimester requires cervical ripening (CR) which can be induced by medicinal or mechanical methods. In the pharmaceutical method, vaginal administration of misoprostol, as well as vaginal trinitroglycerin (TNG), has been shown to induce effective CR. This study was conducted with the aim of comparing vaginal misoprostol and vaginal TNG in the CR of women candidates for the first-trimester curettage. Materials and Methods: This double-blind clinical trial study was conducted on ۱۶۸ pregnant women with a gestational age of less than ۱۴ weeks who were candidates for curettage. Participants were randomly divided into two groups receiving vaginally either TNG (۴۰۰ µgr)(n=۸۷) or misoprostol (۴۰۰ µgr) (n=۸۱). Then, the state of CR and the need for mechanical dilatation were compared between the two groups. Also, the presence of any side effects caused by drug use was determined. Results: The percentage of CR in the misoprostol group (۶۷.۹%) was significantly higher than in the TNG group (۳۲.۲%) (P<۰.۰۰۱). Therefore, the need for mechanical dilatation in the TNG group (۶۶.۷%) was significantly higher compared with the misoprostol group (۳۲.۱%) (P<۰.۰۰۱). Also, the rate of complications like diarrhea (۹.۹%) and abdominal pain (۷.۴%) in the misoprostol group was significantly higher than in the TNG group (۰%). However, headache in the TNG group (۳۴.۵%) was significantly higher than in the misoprostol group (۰%) (P>۰.۰۰۱). Generally, the rate of complications in the TNG group (۳۵.۶%) was significantly higher compared with the misoprostol group (۱۳.۶%) (P>۰.۰۰۱). Conclusion: Vaginally Misoprostol is more effective than vaginally TNG on CR of first-trimester curettage as well as it significantly reduces the need for mechanical dilatation of the cervix.

نویسندگان

Fatemeh Hosseinzadeh

Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Alzahra Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Mandana Mansour Ghanaie

Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Alzahra Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Roya Faraji

Reproductive Health Research center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Ghazaleh Ghorbani

Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Alzahra Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Seyedeh Maryam Asgari Galebin

Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Sedigheh Pakseresht

Department of Obstetrics, Community Health, Women Health Promotion, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti Nursing and Midwifery School, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Saman Maroufizadeh

Department of Biostatistics, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Seyed Mohammad Asgari Galebin

Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran