Evaluation of three final hybrid layer chicken Strains under on-station management

سال انتشار: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 59

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_GJSAR-8-2_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 بهمن 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Three final hybrid strain of chicken were evaluated for production performance under typical floor housing system in Jimma, Ethiopia. One hundred fifty of each of Dominant Sussex, Lohman Brown and Novo Brown breed of day-old chicks obtained from DebreZeitAgriculture Research center was placed at Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine (JUCAVM) brooder house on standard commercial starter’s ration in completely randomized design with three replicates. At the end of the brooding period, each group was transferred to growers and layer’s house and switched to standard growers and layer’s ration at an age of ۸ and ۲۰ weeks, respectively. Finally all the data collected on performance of the experimental breeds of chickens were subjected to statistical analysis to test the breeds’ performance under Jimma condition. The results obtained showed that the mean daily body weight gain (BWG) recorded from Novo Brown and Dominant Sussex breeds of chicks during brooding period were significantly higher (P<۰.۰۵) than Lohman Brown. Mean live weight of ۵۷۳g/head was attained by Novo Brown and Dominant Sussex chicks at an age of two months, the value of which was significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher than that of Lohman Brown. Moreover, Novo Brown growers had significantly higher mean weekly BWG than the other two breeds (P<۰.۰۵), followed by Dominant Sussex. All the three breeds tested, performed better during the brooding period than during the rearing period in terms of feed conversion ratio (FCR). Novo Brown breed of chicks consumed less feed and brought significantly higher mean daily BWG both during brooding and rearing periods (P<۰.۰۵) compared to the others, indicating that Novo Brown was superior to the other two breeds in FCR. Mortality from hatching to ۲ months of age (۸%) was higher for Dominant Sussex, compared to ۱.۳% of mortality recorded from each of the other two breeds.Mortality rate from ۹ to ۲۰ weeks of age was higher for Dominant Sussex than for the other two breeds.There was no significant differences (P>۰.۰۵) among the three breeds tested in age at the first egg. The hen day egg production rate and egg weight of Dominant Sussex was better than other two breeds.In summary, the results of this experiment indicated that the Novo Brown breed of chicken performed better than Dominant Sussex and Lohman Brown breeds of chickens under Jimma condition in most of the economically important production traits studied. Keywords:Dominant Sussex D۱۰۴,Performance evaluation, Lohman Brown, Novo Brown, On-station managementThree final hybrid strain of chicken were evaluated for production performance under typical floor housing system in Jimma, Ethiopia. One hundred fifty of each of Dominant Sussex, Lohman Brown and Novo Brown breed of day-old chicks obtained from DebreZeitAgriculture Research center was placed at Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine (JUCAVM) brooder house on standard commercial starter’s ration in completely randomized design with three replicates. At the end of the brooding period, each group was transferred to growers and layer’s house and switched to standard growers and layer’s ration at an age of ۸ and ۲۰ weeks, respectively. Finally all the data collected on performance of the experimental breeds of chickens were subjected to statistical analysis to test the breeds’ performance under Jimma condition. The results obtained showed that the mean daily body weight gain (BWG) recorded from Novo Brown and Dominant Sussex breeds of chicks during brooding period were significantly higher (P<۰.۰۵) than Lohman Brown. Mean live weight of ۵۷۳g/head was attained by Novo Brown and Dominant Sussex chicks at an age of two months, the value of which was significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher than that of Lohman Brown. Moreover, Novo Brown growers had significantly higher mean weekly BWG than the other two breeds (P<۰.۰۵), followed by Dominant Sussex. All the three breeds tested, performed better during the brooding period than during the rearing period in terms of feed conversion ratio (FCR). Novo Brown breed of chicks consumed less feed and brought significantly higher mean daily BWG both during brooding and rearing periods (P<۰.۰۵) compared to the others, indicating that Novo Brown was superior to the other two breeds in FCR. Mortality from hatching to ۲ months of age (۸%) was higher for Dominant Sussex, compared to ۱.۳% of mortality recorded from each of the other two breeds.Mortality rate from ۹ to ۲۰ weeks of age was higher for Dominant Sussex than for the other two breeds.There was no significant differences (P>۰.۰۵) among the three breeds tested in age at the first egg. The hen day egg production rate and egg weight of Dominant Sussex was better than other two breeds.In summary, the results of this experiment indicated that the Novo Brown breed of chicken performed better than Dominant Sussex and Lohman Brown breeds of chickens under Jimma condition in most of the economically important production traits studied. Keywords:Dominant Sussex D۱۰۴,Performance evaluation, Lohman Brown, Novo Brown, On-station management

نویسندگان

Wasihun Hassen Abate

Jimma university

Mebratu Yigzaw

Injibara University, college of Agriculture, climate and food science, Injibara, Ethiopia

solomon Demeke

jimma university college of Agriculture and veternery medicine

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Abebe, H. 1992. Terminal report on the comparative evaluation of ...
  • Anderson, K.E., Tharrington, J.B., Curtis, P.A., Jones, T., 2004. Shell ...
  • Aygun A, and Yetisir R., 2010. The relationships among egg ...
  • Barua, A., Devanath, S. C. And Hamid, M. A. 1992. ...
  • BPEDORS. 2000.Physical and socio economical profile of 180 District of ...
  • Burley, R.H., 1957. IECA and JATS staff report. Agriculture of ...
  • Bush J. 2006. The threat of Avian Flu: predicted impacts ...
  • Central Agricultural Census Commission 2003. Statistical report on farm management ...
  • CSA. 2016/17.Agricultural sample survey. Report on livestock and livestock characteristics. ...
  • Dawud I, Gebeyehu G, Wondmeneh E, Gashahun B. and TesfayeAbebe. ...
  • De Ketelaere, B., Govaerts, T., Coucke, P., Dewil, E., Visscher, ...
  • Doyon, G., M. Bernier-Cardou, R.M.G. Hamilton, F. Castalgne, C.J. Randall, ...
  • Ensminger, M. E., J. E. Oldfield and W. W. Herneman, ...
  • HalimaH, NeserF. W.C de, KockA, Van and Marle-KösterE, 2006. Growth ...
  • Haugh R, 1937. The Haugh unit of measuring egg quality.US ...
  • Hunton P. 1995. Egg production, processing and marketing. World Poultry ...
  • Lohmann Brown. 2000. Layer management program. Lohmann Tierzucht G.M.B.H., Cuxhaven, ...
  • Luiting P. 1990. Genetic variation of energy partitioning in laying ...
  • Moges F, Abera M, Tadelle D., 2010b. Assessment of village ...
  • Nonga HE, Kajuna FF, Ngowi HA, Karimuribo ED., 2010. Physical ...
  • North M.O. 1984. Pages 690-694 in Commercial Chicken Production Manual.AVI ...
  • SAS Institute Inc., 2002. JMP Statistics and Graphic Guide. JMP, ...
  • Silversides, F.G. and Scott, T.A., 2001. Effect of storage and ...
  • Solomon, D., 2008. Ethiopia: Poultry sector country review. FAO, Rome, ...
  • Tabinda Khawaja, Sohail Hassan Khan, Nasir Mukhtar, MianAsghar Ali, Tanveer ...
  • Tadelle D. Million T., Alemu Y. and Peters K., 2003a. ...
  • Tadelle D., Million T., Alemu Y. and Peters K., 2003b. ...
  • Tadesse, D.T., 2012. Management practices, productive performances and egg quality ...
  • TeketelForsido, 1986. Studies on the Meat Production Potential of Some ...
  • Veena D., Eswara R., Naga M. and Azad S., 2015. ...
  • Von haaren-kiso, Andrea, W. Kühne Und D.K. Flock.1985. Genetisch-statistischeAnalyseverschiedenerKriterien der ...
  • Zhang, L., Ning, Z., Hu, G., Hou Z. and Yang, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع