Nutrients digestibility of rice milling waste (RMW) and soybean meal residue (SMR) combination fed to Yankasa ram lambs in a fragile ecosystem Nigeria

سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 35

فایل این مقاله در 7 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SJVA-4-5_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 اسفند 1402

چکیده مقاله:

This experiment was conducted at Bayero University Kano, to determine the Utilization and digestibility of Soyabean meal Residue (SMR) and Rice Milling Waste by Yankasa ram lambs. The ۲۰ animals were fed with a complete diet containing graded levels of SMR and RMW at ۰, (A) ۵ (B), ۱۰ (C), ۱۵(D) and ۲۰% (E). The trial lasted for ۲۱ days (۱۴ days for adaptation and ۷ days for collection of faecal samples). Harness bags were used for the collection of faecal samples, which was fitted in the last ۷ days of adaptability. Results obtained revealed that DM digestibility (%) was significantly higher (P<۰.۰۵) for treatment E (۷۸.۶۹%) compared to the rest of the values obtained for treatments B (۷۱.۱۲%), C (۷۰.۶۱%) and D (۷۰.۲۹%) whose values did not differ significantly (P>۰.۰۵) between each other. Value obtained for treatment E were comparable (P>۰.۰۵) with treatment A. CP digestibility, value for treatment E (۸۹.۹۵%) was significantly higher (P<۰.۰۵) than those for treatments A (۸۱.۳۱%) and D (۸۵.۲۴%) accept the others (P>۰.۰۵). Treatments B (۸۴.۳۶%) and C (۸۶.۳۷%) were similar (P>۰.۰۵) but significantly higher than those for treatments A (۸۱.۳۱%) and D (۸۵.۲۴%) with the lowest value in treatment D. The EE digestibility values obtained were significantly higher (P<۰.۰۵) for treatments D (۴۶.۱۶%) and E (۵۳.۴۲%) compared to the rest of the values for treatments A (۳۲.۷۵%), B (۴۱.۵۸%) and C (۳۸.۲۲%) whose values did not differ significantly (P>۰.۰۵) between each other. Similarly, values for treatments B, C and D were similar (P>۰.۰۵). Ash digestibility values for treatments A (۶۲.۲۷%), B (۵۶.۵۹%) and C (۵۸.۲۷%) did not differ significantly (P>۰.۰۵) between one another but were significantly lower (P<۰.۰۵) than those for treatments D (۶۷.۳۴%) and E (۷۰.۳۱%) whose values did not differ significantly between each other. Therefore, feeding combination of RMW and SMR to growing Yankasa ram lambs up to ۲۰% inclusion improved digestibility and performance and reduce cost of production. It is recommended that more trial should be conducted with higher inclusion level and with different breeds of Sheep.This experiment was conducted at Bayero University Kano, to determine the Utilization and digestibility of Soyabean meal Residue (SMR) and Rice Milling Waste by Yankasa ram lambs. The ۲۰ animals were fed with a complete diet containing graded levels of SMR and RMW at ۰, (A) ۵ (B), ۱۰ (C), ۱۵(D) and ۲۰% (E). The trial lasted for ۲۱ days (۱۴ days for adaptation and ۷ days for collection of faecal samples). Harness bags were used for the collection of faecal samples, which was fitted in the last ۷ days of adaptability. Results obtained revealed that DM digestibility (%) was significantly higher (P<۰.۰۵) for treatment E (۷۸.۶۹%) compared to the rest of the values obtained for treatments B (۷۱.۱۲%), C (۷۰.۶۱%) and D (۷۰.۲۹%) whose values did not differ significantly (P>۰.۰۵) between each other. Value obtained for treatment E were comparable (P>۰.۰۵) with treatment A. CP digestibility, value for treatment E (۸۹.۹۵%) was significantly higher (P<۰.۰۵) than those for treatments A (۸۱.۳۱%) and D (۸۵.۲۴%) accept the others (P>۰.۰۵). Treatments B (۸۴.۳۶%) and C (۸۶.۳۷%) were similar (P>۰.۰۵) but significantly higher than those for treatments A (۸۱.۳۱%) and D (۸۵.۲۴%) with the lowest value in treatment D. The EE digestibility values obtained were significantly higher (P<۰.۰۵) for treatments D (۴۶.۱۶%) and E (۵۳.۴۲%) compared to the rest of the values for treatments A (۳۲.۷۵%), B (۴۱.۵۸%) and C (۳۸.۲۲%) whose values did not differ significantly (P>۰.۰۵) between each other. Similarly, values for treatments B, C and D were similar (P>۰.۰۵). Ash digestibility values for treatments A (۶۲.۲۷%), B (۵۶.۵۹%) and C (۵۸.۲۷%) did not differ significantly (P>۰.۰۵) between one another but were significantly lower (P<۰.۰۵) than those for treatments D (۶۷.۳۴%) and E (۷۰.۳۱%) whose values did not differ significantly between each other. Therefore, feeding combination of RMW and SMR to growing Yankasa ram lambs up to ۲۰% inclusion improved digestibility and performance and reduce cost of production. It is recommended that more trial should be conducted with higher inclusion level and with different breeds of Sheep.

کلیدواژه ها:

Digestibility ، Yankasa ، Sheep ، Rams ، Lambs ، Rice milling waste (RMW) ، Soybean meal residue (SMR)

نویسندگان

M. G. Garba

Department of Animal Production and Health, Federal University Dutsin-MA, Katsina State. PMB ۵۰۰۱, Nigeria

L. A. Saulawa

Department of Animal Production and Health, Federal University Dutsin-MA, Katsina State. PMB ۵۰۰۱, Nigeria

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Abubakar, A., 2003. Influence of Yeast supplementation on the performance ...
  • AFRIS., 2004. Animal Feed Resources Information System. http//www.Foa.org./ag/agap/afris/defawt/htm. ...
  • AOAC ., 1990.Association of official analytical chemists. Official methods of ...
  • Badr, T., Akkadar, W., 1983. Straw as feed for growing ...
  • Devendra, C.M., 1989. Goat production in the tropics. 92, 305-317. ...
  • Etela, I., Adekunle, O., Orji, U.I., Kalio, G.A, Tona, G.O., ...
  • Feltwell, R., Fox, S.., 1980. Practical Poultry Feeding ELBS low ...
  • KNARDA., 2001. Kano agricultural and rural development authority meteorological station ...
  • Maigandi, S.A., 2001. Quantification and utilization of fore-stomach digesta in ...
  • McDonald, P.,R.A., Edward, Greenhalgh, J.F.D., 1995. Animal Nutrition(5thed.Low price) ELBS ...
  • Muhammad, N., 2005. Assessment of quantity, quality and utilization of ...
  • Muhammad, N., Maigandi, S.A., Hassan, A.W., Daneji, A.I., 2006. Nutrient ...
  • Obeke, E.A., 1985. Nutritive evaluation of rice offal in the ...
  • SAS., 1999. Statistical Analysis System. 16.0 SAS Inc. 1999. ...
  • Shuaib, B.,N.O., Adedipe, A., Aliyuand, M.M.Jr., 1997. Integrated agricultural production ...
  • Smith, O.B., 1988. Studies on the feeding value of agro ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع