Qualitative versus Quantitative Evaluation of Scientists Impact: A Medical Toxicology Tale
سال انتشار: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 279
فایل این مقاله در 7 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_PJMT-3-4_001
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 مهر 1398
چکیده مقاله:
Evaluation of scientists working in a specific area of science is necessary, as they may strive for same limited resources, grants and academic promotions. One of the most common and accepted methods of assessing the performance and impact of a scientist is calculating the number of citations for their publications. However, such method suffer from certain shortcomings. It has become more and more obvious that evaluation of scientists should be qualitative in addition to quantitative. Moreover, the evaluation process should be pragmatic and reflective of the priorities of an institution, a country or an intended population. In this context, a scoring scale called 360-degree researcher evaluation score is proposed in this paper. Accordingly, scientists are evaluated in 5 independent domains including (I) science development, (II) economic impact, (III) policy impact, (IV) societal impact and (V) stewardship of research. This scale is designed for evaluation of impacts resulted from research activities and thus it excludes the educational programs done by a scientist. In general, it seems necessary that the evaluation process of a scientist’s impact moves from only scintometric indices to a combination of quantitative and qualitative indices.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Reza Afshari
Addiction Research Centre, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | Division of Basic Medical Sciences, Academy of Sciences of Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran
Seyed Mostafa Monzavi
Addiction Research Centre, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :