Divine Foreknowledge and Human Moral Responsibility (In Defense of Muslim Philosophers’ Approach)

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: فارسی
مشاهده: 268

فایل این مقاله در 16 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_PHILO-13-28_018

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 8 دی 1398

چکیده مقاله:

According to most Muslim philosophers, the Divine foreknowledge, on the one hand, is so inclusive that encompasses each and every minor and timed action of moral agents, and because of the perfection of God in essence and attributes, any defects in His essence and attributes including any errors in His foreknowledge are impossible. On the other hand, these philosophers, like other defenders of free will, claim that significance of any kind of free will and responsibility of a moral agent depends on their access to alternate possibilities (PAP (and, consequently, their ability to do and not to do an action simultaneously. This paper aims to deal with this highly debated and rooted question that whether these two views are essentially in conflict with each other. To answer this pivotal question briefly based on a modified version of Frankfurt cases and Muslim philosophers’ definition of free will, we attempt to defend their initial approach to eliminating the conflict between Divine foreknowledge and free will or moral responsibility and show that, firstly, this infallible knowledge is contingent on the agent’s voluntary action and, secondly, despite the principle of alternate possibilities, moral responsibility of the agent does not depend on the person’s avoidance of the forthcoming action.

کلیدواژه ها:

foreknowledge ، moral responsibility ، free will ، Frankfurt ، principle of alternative possibilities (PAP)

نویسندگان

توکل کوهی گیگلو

استادیار گروه معارف اسلامی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهر، ایران

سید ابراهیم آقازاده

استادیار گروه معارف اسلامی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Dennett, Daniel C. (1984) Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free ...
  • Fischer, John Martin and Ravizza, Mark (1991) Responsibility and Inevitability ...
  • Frankfurt, Harry (1969) Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibilities , Journal ...
  • Helli, Hasan Ibn Yousef (1984) Kashfol Morad, Qom: Mostafavi Publication. ...
  • Ibn Sina, Hossein Ibn Abdollah (1984) Shefa, Qom: School of ...
  • Jorjani, Seyed Sharif (1991) Sharhol Mavaghef, Qom: Alrazi Publication, Vol. ...
  • Levy, Neil and McKenna Michael (2009) Recent Work on Free ...
  • Mesbah Yazdi, Mohammad Taghi (2000) Theological Instructions, Tehran: International Publication, ...
  • Mir Damad, Mohammad Bagher (1995) Gabasat, Tehran: University of Tehran ...
  • Mir Damad, Mohammad Bagher (2001) Mosannafat, Tehran: Cultural Heritage Society, ...
  • Mulla Sadra, Sadroddin Mohammad (1980) Alshavahedol Roboubieh, Mashhad: Mashhad University ...
  • Mulla Sadra, Sadroddin Mohammad (1981) Alhekmatol Motaalieh, Beirout, Dar Olehyae ...
  • Pike, Nelson (1993) A latter-day look at the Foreknowledge Problem ...
  • Pinnock, Clark H. and Others (1994) the Openness of God: ...
  • Sohrevardi, Shahaboddin Yahya (1976) Collection of Writings, Talvihat; Correction and ...
  • Taftazani, Masoud Ibn Umar (1989) Sharh Olmaghased, Corrected by Abdolrahman ...
  • Tavakoli, GholamHossein (2011) Human s Freedom and Divine Foreknowledge , ...
  • Van Inwagen, Peter, (1983) An Essay on Free Will, Oxford: ...
  • Warfield, Ted (2003) Compatibilism and Incompatibilism: Some Arguments, the Oxford ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع