Perceptions of college lecturers and students towards the assessment of student teachers with special needs in inclusive contexts: A case of one college of teacher education in Zimbabwe

سال انتشار: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 41

فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SJPAS-6-7_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 3 اسفند 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Assessment processes are critical in educational practice since quality education can be measured through these processes. The purpose of this study was to explore perceptions of college lecturers and students on the nature of assessment procedures obtaining for students with special needs in inclusive contexts. The study is grounded in Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences and the social model of disability. The observation that teachers’ colleges in Zimbabwe often have no inclusive policy guidelines on the assessment of students with special needs motivated the study. A case study was conducted within the qualitative paradigm. Semi structured questionnaires and focus group discussions were used as the main data collection instruments for ۱۵ lecturers and ۲۰ students chosen using simple random and purposive sampling respectively. The main findings revealed that there were challenges of assessing students with special needs together with their peers without special needs. It was observed that extra time given to students with special needs was done ad hoc as there were no policy guidelines. The results further revealed that it was not clear whether the bases for assessment were premised on the student’s level of disability, educational skills, competences or concepts. Ultimately, the study concluded that there was no equality of opportunities in the assessment of students with disabilities at the teachers college. In view of these findings, the study recommended the need for modifications whose decisions should be based on agreed policy guidelines and a national framework for the assessment of tertiary education students with special needs.Assessment processes are critical in educational practice since quality education can be measured through these processes. The purpose of this study was to explore perceptions of college lecturers and students on the nature of assessment procedures obtaining for students with special needs in inclusive contexts. The study is grounded in Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences and the social model of disability. The observation that teachers’ colleges in Zimbabwe often have no inclusive policy guidelines on the assessment of students with special needs motivated the study. A case study was conducted within the qualitative paradigm. Semi structured questionnaires and focus group discussions were used as the main data collection instruments for ۱۵ lecturers and ۲۰ students chosen using simple random and purposive sampling respectively. The main findings revealed that there were challenges of assessing students with special needs together with their peers without special needs. It was observed that extra time given to students with special needs was done ad hoc as there were no policy guidelines. The results further revealed that it was not clear whether the bases for assessment were premised on the student’s level of disability, educational skills, competences or concepts. Ultimately, the study concluded that there was no equality of opportunities in the assessment of students with disabilities at the teachers college. In view of these findings, the study recommended the need for modifications whose decisions should be based on agreed policy guidelines and a national framework for the assessment of tertiary education students with special needs.

کلیدواژه ها:

Assessment ، Students with special needs ، Inclusive contexts

نویسندگان

Patrick Sibanda

Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Zimbabwe Open University, Zimbabwe

Mlungisi Moyo

United College of Education, Zimbabwe

Royal Ntini

United College of Education, Zimbabwe

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • American Psychological Association, 2016. Reasonable accommodations explained. Washington: APA. ...
  • Bauer, A., Brown, G., 2001. Adolescents and inclusion: Transforming secondary ...
  • Booth, T., Ainscow, M., 2002. Index for inclusion: Developing learning ...
  • Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education, 2003. Index for inclusion: ...
  • Delors, J., 1996. Learning the treasure within: Report to UNESCO ...
  • European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education, 2005. Assessment ...
  • Gartner, A., Dorothy, K.L., 1997. Inclusion and school reform. Transforming ...
  • Gregory, G., Chapman, C., 2002. Differentiated instructional strategies: One size ...
  • Hallahan, D., 2012. Exceptional learners. Boston: Pearson. ...
  • International Consultative Forum on EFA, 2005. Global monitoring report: The ...
  • Keeves, J.P., 1994. National examinations: Design, procedures and reporting. Fundamentals ...
  • Marzano, R., 2000. Transforming classroom grading. Alexandria: Association for supervision ...
  • Meijer, C.J.W., 2003. Special education across Europe in 2003: Trends ...
  • Munk, D., Bursuck, W., 2003. Grading students with disabilities. Educ. ...
  • Nevada Partnership for Inclusive Education, 2016. The promise of inclusive ...
  • No Child Left Behind Act, 2002. PL 107-110, 115 Stat. ...
  • Operttie, R., Belalcfizar, C., 2008. Trends in inclusive education at ...
  • Pepper, D., 2007. Assessment for disabled students. An International Comparison. ...
  • Peters, S., 2004. Inclusive education: An EFA strategy for all ...
  • Philips, S., Clarke, A., 2010. Pathways for students with disabilities ...
  • Reeves, D.B., 2008. Leading to change/effective grading practices. Educ. Leader., ...
  • Salend, S.J., 2001. Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective and reflective practices ...
  • Salend, S.J., 2005. Report card models that support communication and ...
  • Salend, S.J., Duhaney, L., 2002. Grading students in inclusive settings. ...
  • Sharp, K., Earle, S., 2000. Assessmen, disability and the problem ...
  • Snell, M.E., Brown, F., 2011. Instruction of students with severe ...
  • Tomlinson, C., 2001. How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms ...
  • UNESCO, 1994. The Salamanca statement and framework for action on ...
  • UNESCO, 2003. Overcoming exclusion through inclusive approaches in education. A ...
  • UNESCO, 2005. Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring access to education for ...
  • UNESCO, 2009. Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. Paris: UNESCO. ...
  • UNESCO, 2015. Teaching children with disabilities in inclusive settings. Paris: ...
  • UNICEF, 2003. Inclusive education initiatives for children with disabilities. Lesson ...
  • Watkins, A., 2007. Assessment in inclusive settings: Key issues for ...
  • Wood, J., 1998. Adapting instruction to accommodate students in inclusive ...
  • Wray, M., 2002. Modification of examination and assessment arrangements for ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع